|
|
|
DARRELL ISSA (R-CA)
Top Contributors
| 1 |
General Atomics |
$10,000 |
| 2 |
Titan Corp |
$9,185 |
| 3 |
Science Applications International Corp |
$7,250 |
| 4 |
American Bankers Assn |
$6,000 |
| 4 |
Intel Corp |
$6,000 |
| 6 |
Edison International |
$5,500 |
| 6 |
Exxon Mobil |
$5,500 |
| 6 |
Qualcomm Inc |
$5,500 |
| 9 |
Allergan Inc |
$5,000 |
| 9 |
American Medical Assn |
$5,000 |
| 9 |
Harrah's Entertainment |
$5,000 |
| 9 |
SBC Communications |
$5,000 |
| 9 |
Siebel Systems |
$5,000 |
| 14 |
Glaxosmithkline |
$4,500 |
| 14 |
National Assn of Home Builders |
$4,500 |
| 16 |
BAE Systems North America |
$4,000 |
| 16 |
Credit Union National Assn |
$4,000 |
| 16 |
Microsoft Corp |
$4,000 |
| 16 |
National Rifle Assn |
$4,000 |
| 16 |
Society of American Florists |
$4,000 |
Percent of Contributions Coded:
(How to read this chart / methodology)
|
 |
Coded |
$402,561 |
(81.1%) |
 |
Uncoded |
$94,105 |
(18.9%) |
| |
Total |
$496,666 |
|
|
|
|
HOW TO READ THIS CHART:
This chart lists the top donors to this member of Congress during the current election cycle. The organizations themselves did not donate, rather the money came from the organization's PAC, its individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals' immediate families. Organization totals include subsidiaries and affiliates.
Typically, members of Congress draw their contributions from two main sources: PACs and lobbyists who give because of the member's position on key congressional committees, and local companies, unions and other organizations from their home district. Challengers tend to rely more heavily on home-state donors, since most PACs put most of their dollars behind incumbents.
Why (and How) We Use Donors’ Employer/Occupation Information
METHODOLOGY
NOTE: All the numbers on this page are for the 2001-2002 House election cycle and
based on Federal Election Commission data released electronically on Wednesday, March 05, 2003.
Help! The numbers don't add up...")
Feel free to distribute or cite this material, but please credit the Center for Responsive Politics.
|
|
